Biden Declares Mass Killing of Armenian People a Genocide

When Turkey was still the ruling seat for the Ottoman Empire, the 1915 massacre of Armenians was seen by officials at the time as a necessity to prevent future problems during the first World War.

President Joe Biden became the first US president to describe this act as genocide in a formal state issued in 2021.

Turkey rejected the term immediately. Although they acknowledge that the atrocities took place, the current government disagrees with the damaging label. Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu retorted that his government “entirely rejects” Biden’s words.

“We will not take lessons from anyone on our history,” Cavusoglu stated on his social media account.

Previous Presidents Have Not Used the Term

Turks accused the Christian Armenians of treachery. The Ottoman Empire suffered a massive defeat to the Russians, so they started deporting the Armenians to the Syrian desert.

When that option wasn’t handling the situation as well as they hoped, the outright massacres began in some communities. Diplomats, missionaries, and journalists all witnesses the killings.

Between getting stranded in the desert or murdered directly, hundreds of thousands of Armenians lost their lives because of the government’s actions.

Biden’s words in 2021 followed a bill passed by the US House of Representatives in 2019 that recognized the mass killings as genocide.

The only other president that took a similar step was Ronald Reagan. He referred to the Armenian genocide during a Holocaust proclamation in 1981. As for the Trump administration’s view on these actions, they chose to call it one of the “worst mass atrocities” of the 20th century.

The reactions from other places in the world have been largely positive. Nikol Pashinyan, who serves as the Armenian Prime Minister, said that Biden’s words honored the memory of those who died.

Turkey continues to say that America’s actions are opening a “deep wound” that might not get healed. Stay connected with top news sites for updates.

Putin Signs Law Allowing Him to Stay in Power Until 2036

With a new law that allows Vladimir Putin to remain in power until 2036, the stage is now set for the leader to run for two more terms. That move, which was made possible from a constitutional amendments referendum in 2020, enables Putin to become the longest leader in the country since Peter the Great.

Critics and opponents of the new legislation say that it allows him to become president for life.

Although Putin puts on an outward appearance of being a democratically elected leader, it would be fair to call him more of an authoritarian president. He’s already been in power for 20 years, and now he could be in office until the age of 83. He assumed to the role of the presidency in 1999 after serving as a KGB operative.

Putin Has Becoming Increasingly Aggressive on Multiple Fronts

Although Putin has made headlines in 2021 because of the country’s treatment of Alexei Navalny, Russia’s government has been more aggressive on multiple domestic and international fronts.

They have been waging interference campaigns in American elections, actively involved in conflict with Kremlin-backed separatists in Ukraine, and even built-up military assets along the border.

There’s an active effort to reinforce the Arctic region as global warming brings the potential for opening new sea lanes.

Biden called Putin a “killer” during a March interview, to which Putin said that when someone calls you a name, that’s really who they are.”

The 1999 Russian bombings of an apartment complex were what brought Putin to power initially. Although his role has changed over the years, he has remained in power throughout the entire time.

With this new law, there is nothing that stands in the way of Putin staying in charge for at least two more six-year terms.

North Korea Will Skip the 2021 Olympics

According to a state-run website from North Korea, the government is deciding to skip the 2021 Olympics that Tokyo is hosting in 2021. The official reason for dropping out for the first time in over thirty years is the coronavirus, but it might be an issue that runs deeper than the virus.

In the past, North Korea used global sporting events like the Olympics to create diplomatic opportunities. The goal was to create sanctions relief in exchange for nuclear disarmament, which now cannot happen since they’re choosing not to participate.

That’s why some analysts think that the decision is more of a message to the Biden administration than an issue with COVID-19.

It’s Not the First Time North Korea Has Taken This Action

In previous years, North Korea boycotted the Olympics and other international sports events for political reasons. It has sometimes decided not to attend or support the global athletics community when no one qualified to participate.

It is the first time that the North Korean government has cited an infectious disease for deciding not to participate.

The government has the reputation for withdrawing from talks or political discourse, only to return at the last second to enhance its bargaining power. Since the nation has been on high alert to prevent COVID-19, this step might be a permanent one.

Without any healthcare infrastructure to support the general population, North Korea has had to take draconian steps to prevent the spread of the disease. That includes preventing foreign nationals from leaving while having a 15-month closure of its international borders.

With little movement on nuclear talks, Biden has already said that North Korea won’t get the same attention as it did with the Trump administration. That meant they’d leave Tokyo empty-handed, so there is no purpose for their attendance.

Continued domestic challenges might change that perspective in the future.

Chinese Investments Drop By 61% in Australia

After the events of COVID-19 affected China’s economy at the start of 2020, the economic giant decided to keep things local for the year.

That fact, along with a growing diplomatic rift between them and Australia, showed an investment drop of 61% between the two countries. It’s the lowest level of monetary transfer since 2015.

The Australian Database CHIIA found that about $1 billion in Australian dollars was received, equivalent to about $780 million in US funds.

Only 20 investments were recorded for the year, which is significantly lower than the 111 that occurred in 2016. This drop is on top of another 47% reduction that happened from 2019.

Why Did Australia Lose So Much Money?

The issue of foreign direct investment (FDI) goes beyond whatever rifts China and Australia have with each other. Data from the United Nations shows that total FDI levels dropped by 42% globally in 2020.

Although Australia’s outcomes were above average because of their relationship with China, the issue is more profound because their FDI receipts are in only three sections: mining, real estate, and manufacturing.

Australia is also partially to blame for this outcome. The government announced in March that every proposed investment would receive additional scrutiny from a review board. In the past, only non-sensitive transactions applied for assets worth $930 million or more.

That switch stopped a $600 million sale of Lion Dairy, a wholly-owned subsidiary of a Japanese company, to the China Mengniu Dairy.

If that one transaction were allowed, the figures would have been similar despite the fewer total numbers.

China continues to treat the countries that are calling for COVID-19 investigations with restrictions or tariffs. Some products have totaled more than 200%, causing a lot of alarm since about 40% of exports head there from Australia.

Oil States Could Lose $13 Trillion by 2040

When Joe Biden was debating Donald Trump in the run-up to the 2020 Presidential election, one of the issues he brought up was a shift to a greener economy.

By using more renewable energy resources, it could be possible to cut down on the quantity of greenhouse gases getting produced each day.

Although that shift to eco-friendly power might help the environment, it could cause some countries to lose an average of 40% of their revenues. The collective losses from such an event could total $13 trillion by 2040.

That’s why nations like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are looking for ways to diversify their economies instead of looking at oil alone.

How Dependent Are Come Countries on Oil?

Although the median losses might total 40% by switching to environmentally friendly power resources, the problem is far greater in some parts of the world.

The financial dependence on oil for Iraq could cause it to lose up to 80% of its annual revenues. That’s about the same amount that Equatorial Guinea would have start disappearing.

Another seven countries, including Saudi Arabia, would lose more than 60% of their incoming resources.

The countries with the lowest production costs would be the only ones spared as they’d be the primary suppliers of the petroleum hydrocarbons that get used for numerous products.

How Fast Can These Countries Diversify?

When looking at the revenues of the oil-producing nations in 2021, the countries that stand to lose the most during a switch to green energy are also among the poorest ones out there. That’s why income diversification is a crucial task to complete.

Each country will need to take individualized steps to offset this issue. There must be improvements to government quality, more investment in education, and business climate changes to encourage development.

The rest of the world should support this transition. Even if we excuse the moral argument, a stronger global economy helps everyone find ways to chase their dreams.

Why Is China Cracking Down on Tech Firms?

China recently changed its rules regarding digital payment and Internet services. The global community sees this regulatory shift as a problem for tech firms, although the government calls it a “tightening” of the local anti-monopoly guidelines.

The news rules essentially block a company from forcing sellers to choose between the leading online providers for specific needs. Before the regulatory change, this process was considered a common practice in the country.

Experts see the guidelines aimed at Alipay, WeChat Pay, Taobao, and Alibaba.

Isn’t It a Good Thing to Stop Monopolies?

When we think about monopolies, we’re looking at the business structure from a capitalist viewpoint. If one organization can set the prices, market conditions, and access for goods or services because they’re the only provider, it limits competition and innovation.

The socialist, communist government in China uses the opposite end of a mixed economy. Although there are capitalist elements to the business world, the government holds a stake in virtually all significant businesses

China sees itself in the same battle against tech companies that some conservative and liberal groups feel is happening in the United States. The only difference is that the Chinese government has the authority for immediate intervention, like when it ordered Jack Ma to scale back his expansion plans for an Alibaba subsidiary.

What set off this issue in the first place? For many outside observers, it was the criticism that Ma leveled against the Chinese government.

What Does This Effort Mean to Everyone Else?

At the moment, the rules and regulatory changes are designed to create pressure on Chinese tech firms to comply with government wishes.

The issue could come to a head in the next few months as business leaders come into conflict with political desires.

With as much control as the tech giants have in China, their information assets could trigger the government’s mood changes. Political leaders recognize this, and they are moving to stop it.

These firms aren’t backing down. With more hiring happening in legal and compliance areas, expect battlelines to be drawn soon.

This Is What Led to Alexei Navalny’s Arrest and Global Attention

Alexei Navalny was sent to a Russian penal colony to serve out a sentence for “crimes” against the Russian government. All but a handful of countries have gone on the record to declare it an unjust action since Navalny is an outspoken critic of Vladimir Putin.

The Wall Street Journal once called Navalny the “man that Putin fears the most.”

His work as an anti-corruption activist, lawyer, and opposition leader led him to prominence for organizing anti-government demonstrations. Navalny also ran for office to advocate for new reforms in these areas.

Navalny frequently publishes content about Russian corruption, including calling the government a “party of crooks and thieves.”

Navalny Was Poisoned in 2020

Alexei Navalny was hospitalized in August 2020 after being poisoned by a nerve agent. Authorities evacuated him to Berlin to receive treatment, which took a month to complete.

Navalny accused Putin of being responsible for his actions, which was followed up by having FSB agents from the country admitting to the work they had done.

Although Navalny was reasonably safe outside of Russia, he decided to return on January 17, 2021. The local authorities detained him immediately, accusing him of parole violations that stemmed from a 2014 political conviction.

Navalny had his suspended sentence replaced with a prison term, giving him about 30 months in a corrective labor colony.

Multiple agencies and governments continue to call for his release.

Navalny Has Been Nominated for the 2021 Nobel Peace Price

After speaking out in support of Black Lives Matter protests, European democracy efforts, and anti-corruption rallies, multiple Norwegian parliament members nominated Navalny for the 2021 Nobel Peace Prize.

An Internet petition in support of this effort has tens of thousands of signatures.

The European Commission on Human Rights continues to call for his release. Navalny’s wife and two children continue to live safely in Russia while he serves his sentence.

For more news like this, staying in touch with the world’s leading news sites.

What Steps Is Europe Taking to Battle COVID Resurgence?

When the United States started taking action to battle a COVID resurgence, it became a patchwork quilt of regulations and restrictions. Each state had a different approach to preventing the coronavirus from spreading over the winter months.

In Europe, the approach was a little different. Most countries adopted temporary rules that would halt the spread of the coronavirus with common-sense decisions.

There were local curfews implemented, alcohol bans, and restrictions on indoor social gatherings.

When the UK recognized that a new variant was more contagious and potentially deadlier, they put in the strictest lockdowns that matched what people experienced in March and April 2020.

We Are in a Race to Vaccinate

Global stories of rising infection rates show how critical the need is for us to find a vaccination protocol that works. Although the UK was the first western nation to start an inoculation program, the rest of Europe fell far short with ordering bottlenecks and global production shortages.

With 1.8 million people dying from COVID-19 in 2020 (and potentially many more who died from undocumented circumstances), we cannot afford to let a resurgence continue.

Each holiday creates a sharp rise in infections and deaths as people gather and the virus spreads. In Thailand, a single outbreak at a seafood market led to a countrywide spread that affected 53 of the 77 provinces.

The coronavirus moves fast. When French police booked hundreds of partygoers at an illegal rave, the risk for more infections was massive.

Even when there are outdoor environments involved, close contact can still create COVID-19 problems. Dozens of infections are directly tied to the January 6 insurgence at the US capitol building, for example, and similar issues have crept up in Europe.

What can you do to ensure that you’re staying in the fight against COVID-19? You can eat healthy foods, take your supplements daily, and keep wearing a mask.

How Russia Could Benefit from Global Warming

Although the Russian government noted that changes to global temperatures represent potential problems, they also recognize some massive economic opportunities could develop.

The Russians published a paper in early 2020 outlining action plans that could help people while attempting to mitigate a warming climate’s damage.

Although everyone faces potential challenges because of climate change, Russia is at the forefront of this battle. The country is warming up to 2.5 times faster than the planet.

What Could Russia Do to Benefit from Climate Change?

The first step Russia intends to take when battling climate change is to change its agricultural approach. The government recommends planting drought-resistant crops, preparing emergency vaccinations, and planning new evacuation routes.

They’ve included building dams as part of the plan to provide water reservoirs for communities that could become isolated with climate change.

After outlining the plans to counter the adverse effects, the Russian government acknowledges that several positives could come from a warming planet.

For starters, the households living in the country’s colder regions would use less energy to manage indoor environments. A warmer climate would encourage a longer growing season, opening new cropland development opportunities.

Russia also sees melting ice along the polar region as a chance to drill for oil or create new navigable waterways that could benefit them economically.

Over 30 Measures Are Part of the Plan

As part of this evaluation process, Russia intends to calculate the risks of domestic products becoming less competitive due to the changing climate. If their standards fail to meet global agreements for managing planetary temperatures, their economy could find itself on the outside looking in at everyone else.

The Russian government has new educational materials to offer students to start teaching about climate change.

Since many of Russia’s northern infrastructure investments are on permafrost, they must act now. The lessons they learn over the next few years will help the world understand what to expect from these changes.

2020 Was One of the Three Warmest Years on Record

Whether we want to recognize climate change or agree to disagree, the facts don’t lie. In 2020, we experienced one of the three warmest years ever recorded in our planet’s history.

The only other two years that were hotter were 2016 and 2019, respectively.

When we look at the global records that were taken starting in 1850, all six of the warmest years ever recorded have happened since 2015. The most notable changes with this climate adjustment have occurred in the Siberian Arctic, where it is about 5°C warmer now than it was a decade ago.

We also had 30 named storms during the North Atlantic hurricane season, shattering the record number of those events in 2020.

Russia Recorded a Global Record High in 2020

Although most places in the world only see a fractional degree difference because of the global warming issues, the Siberian Arctic is a different story.

Verkhoyansk recorded a temperature on June 20 of 38°C (100.4°F), which was verified independently by scientists and meteorologists outside of Russia. This temperature is the highest recorded anywhere within the Arctic Circle.

Europe also recorded its hottest period ever from January to October in 2020.

Although the heat is what creates the headlines when we talk about global warming, climate change can also cause some regions to be abnormally cool. India, Australia, Brazil, and Canada were below average in 2020.

What does this information mean? When we look at the long-term implications of climate change, the decade from 2011-2020 is the warmest ever recorded by humans. Most of the warming gases end up in the oceans, causing an acidification effect that adversely affects that biome.

When the oceans start warming up, the sea levels can rise. That means any coastal community would need to be on alert to make adjustments to their infrastructure.